Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/27/2007 11:15 PM:
...

> Otherwise it's not so hard to overlook some stagnation.

Btw., after this 'forking' thing etc. it seems I might have lost the point
a little: which removed choices should justify such a fork. But, I hope,
you didn't mean your patch only, because then e.g. this stagnation threat
looks like a bit exaggerated...

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux