Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 - Kernel Panic on IO-APIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:28:32 -0800
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:14:17 +0100
> Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> Maybe if you can emit a broken-out with the fresh pull to test?
> > > 
> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ is current.  But it probably won't
> > > compile. 
> > 
> > Yes it did :). And it worked. Both in qemu and on my desktop...
> 
> boggle.  Let's slap 2.6.25 on it and take the rest of the year off.

No worries, the mmotm compiling issue seems to have been fixed:

  CC [M]  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.o
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:39: error: field ‘rphy’ has incomplete type
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c: In function ‘sas_discover_sata’:
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:773: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ata_sas_rphy_alloc’
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:775: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:775: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:781: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:782: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:784: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘__mptr’
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:784: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:791: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ata_sas_rphy_add’
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:807: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ata_sas_rphy_delete’
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:809: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ata_sas_rphy_free’
make[3]: *** [drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/libsas] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/scsi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

So much for continuing the bisect with that tree, to find the
cause of the second bug :)

Guess I'll extract an x86 tree changeset first, to place into
the 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 broken out tree and work from there...

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux