On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:43:24AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Rusty said:
>
> > Well, introduce an EXPORT_SYMBOL_INTERNAL(). It's a lot less code. But you'd
> > still need to show that people are having trouble knowing what APIs to use.
>
> Might the recent discussion on the exporting of sys_open() and
> sys_read() be an example here? There would appear to be a consensus
> that people should not have used those functions, but they are now
> proving difficult to unexport.
That is a good example yes.
> Perhaps the best use of the namespace stuff might be for *future*
> exports which are needed to help make the mainline kernel fully modular,
> but which are not meant to be part of a more widely-used API?
Not sure about future only, but yes that is its intention.
Thanks for putting it clearly.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
