On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:23:13PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Contrary to what I claimed later in the thread, my 64-bit powerpc box > > (quad-core G5) doesn't suffer from this problem. > > > > Does anybody have any idea? I don't even know how to debug it further. > > I'll see if I can grab an appropriate machine tomorrow and have a look at > it. I think it's just an accounting bug, which is probably my fault :) Thanks. Let me know if you need any info. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- From: [email protected] (Tony Breeds)
- time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- Prev by Date: Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu
- Previous by thread: Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- Next by thread: Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
- Index(es):