On Nov 26, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Powerpc has a way to determine the address of the per cpu area of the
currently executing processor via the paca and the array of per cpu
offsets is avoided by looking up the per cpu area from the remote
paca's (copying x86_64).
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
---
include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h 2007-11-24
10:27:31.088350556 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h 2007-11-24
10:29:20.752350757 -0800
@@ -16,25 +16,6 @@
#define __my_cpu_offset() get_paca()->data_offset
#define per_cpu_offset(x) (__per_cpu_offset(x))
This concerns me. paca doesn't exist on all PPC platforms.
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]