Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Make a single va_start() -> va_end() path + fixing:
Ok, this should be 2 separate patches then.
Thought about it, but they were so simple, I believed they would better
be merged...
The warning fixes are all good, but I fail to see the point of the va_end()
one. That doesn't seem to bring any sort of improvement while adding one
variable to the stack and one loop test. Any explanation here ?
Not really. Many seem to like a single return and since this made it one
va_end() to every va_start(), I thought it would be appropriate. But if
not, then I will only filter this hit out from the
va_start()->va_end()-testing and get going.
I'll push the warning fix for now, thanks.
Alright, thank you.
Cheers,
Samuel.
cu
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
