Re: [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume

> Could we by any chance just force every architecture using generic code
> to implement PTRACE_SINGLESTEP and PTRACE_SYSEMU?  This will lead to
> both far less messy code and a more consistant user interface.

I'd like to look into that later after most arch's have moved to using the
generic code for their existing support.  I am thoroughly in favor, but it
requires some more groundwork that can come after this initial stage.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup)
• Next by Date: Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume
• Next by thread: [PATCH 11/27] x86-64: ptrace generic resume
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]