On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Okay, so the problem seems to be we are using unreliable lapic
> timer... which is stopped in C3 (and in C2 on broken machines).
>
> I do not see any mechanism to disable lapic; there seems to be some
> mechanism to work around stopped lapic timer is used (in
> acpi/processor_idle.c) but it does not seem to work. So what about
> this?
nolapic_timer on 32bit
noapictimer on 64bit
Sigh, I know that sucks, but it's the history of the diverged trees.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- [patch] Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- nohz and strange sleep latencies
- Prev by Date: Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup)
- Next by Date: Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- Previous by thread: [patch] Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- Next by thread: Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
- Index(es):
 |