On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:21:07PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > There isn't any big advantage and doesn't seem to be much usage of
> > > modular schedulers.
> > >
> > > OTOH, the overhead made the kernel image of an x86 defconfig (that
> > > doesn't use modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB.
> >
> > Big nack, I use it all the time for testing.
>
> OK.
>
> > Just because you don't
> > happen to use it is not a reason to remove it.
>
> s/you/you and all distributions you checked/
Well they should make them modules (two of them, that is). It's been a
long time since I considered a distro .config a benchmark/guideline of
any sort.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
