On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:50:52 +0000
Luciano Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dumb memcpy (while (len--) { *d++ = *s++ }) will have alignment problems
> in any case. Intelligent ones, like the one provided in glibc, first copy
> bytes till output is aligned (C file) *or* size is a multiple (i686 asm file)
> of word size, and then it copies word-by-word.
>
> Linux's x86_64 memcpy does the opposite, copies 64bit words, and then
> copies the last bytes.
>
> So, in effect, as long as no packed structures are used, memcpy should
> be safer on *int, etc., than *char, as the compiler ensures
> word-alignment.
>
It most certainly does not. gcc will assume that an int* has int alignment. memcpy() is a builtin, which gcc can translate to pretty much anything. And C specifies that a pointer to foo, will point to a real object of type foo, so gcc can't be blamed for the unsafe typecasts. I have tested this the hard way, so this is not just speculation.
E.g., we have the following struct:
struct foo
{
u8 a[4];
u32 b;
};
This struct will have a size of 8 bytes and an alignment of 4 bytes (caused by the member b). Now take the following code:
void copy_foo(struct foo *dst, struct foo *src)
{
*dst = *src;
}
On a platform that supports 64-bit loads and stores (e.g. AVR32, where I got hit by this), this will generate:
LD r1, (src)
ST r1, (dst)
Now if I replace that with:
void copy_foo(struct foo *dst, struct foo *src)
{
memcpy(dst, src, sizeof(struct foo));
}
then it will generate the same code. So I cannot use copy_foo() to transfer a struct foo either out of, or into a packet buffer.
In other words, memcpy() does _not_ save you from alignment issues. If you cast from char* or void* to something else, you better be damn sure the alignment is correct because gcc will assume it is.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
