Re: [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks

On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:18:35PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> I will reapply agk-dm-dm-crypt-move-bio-submission-to-thread.patch and
> this patch and boot several times

OK for a test system, but until the write loop problem is addressed I believe
there's a risk of data corruption under low memory conditions.  (I dropped it
from the export to -mm a few days ago for this reason.)

Alasdair
-- 
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1: kcryptd vs lockdep
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks
    • From: "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] debug_check_no_locks_freed: fix in_range() checks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]