On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> my kernel reported:
>
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Thats TASKLET_SOFTIRQ
> I cannot interpret it, but probably this is bad, because before
> bc5393a6c9c0e70b4b43fb2fb63e3315e9a15c8f this used to BUG().
We removed the BUG, because it's a situation where the kernel can
easily recover. It should never happen that the kernel goes to sleep
with a pending softirq, but it's not a fatal error.
> This happend while having a high load. Up to now it only happend once
> and I cannot reproduce it.
That's hard to tell then. Without a reproducible test case I can not
do much to help debugging this.
tglx
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]