Re: [RFC] Documentation about unaligned memory access

[Heikki Orsila <shdl@zakalwe.fi>]

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:15:53AM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Why unaligned access is bad
> ===========================
> 
> Most architectures are unable to perform unaligned memory accesses. Any
> unaligned access causes a processor exception.

"Some architectures are unable to perform unaligned memory accesses, 
either an exception is generated, or the data 
access is silently invalid. In architectures that allow unaligned 
access, natural aligned accesses are usually faster than non-aligned."

> In summary: if your code causes unaligned memory accesses to happen, your code
> will not work on some platforms, and will perform *very* badly on others.

*very* -> *slower*

> Natural alignment
> =================

Please move this definition before "Why unaligned access is bad".

Also, it would be nice to have a table of ISAs:

ISA		Need		Need
		natural		alignment
		alignment	by x
--------------------------------------------
m68k		No		2
powerpc/ppc	Yes		Word size
x86		No		No
x86_64		No		No

-- 
Heikki Orsila			Barbie's law:
heikki.orsila@iki.fi		"Math is hard, let's go shopping!"
http://www.iki.fi/shd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/