On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:36:52 +1100 Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
> This change allows force_sig_info to be called from modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
>
> --
>
> Any objections to exporting this symbol? I'm planning to move some
> SPU fault-handling code from the kernel to the spufs.ko object.
>
> ---
>
> kernel/signal.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-spufs.orig/kernel/signal.c
> +++ linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *
>
> return ret;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(force_sig_info);
>
> void
> force_sig_specific(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
Perhaps export it from within a powerpc-specific C file (along with
suitable comment) to prevent people from generally relying upon the export?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
