* Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
> > are you sure? The last -ck patch i can find is for .22:
>
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/
>
> > or have they been forward ported? (if yes, do you have an URL for that)
>
> > (my guess is you used the 2.6.23.1 scheduler (CFS), so the improvement
> > you felt on the laptop is relative to 2.6.23-vanilla in essence - which
> > is good news.)
>
> waninkoko over at forums.gentoo.org tries to forward port ck-patchset
> as long as he can, as you can see
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-577970.html
> (see later kamikaze-sources / zen-sources / klight-sources for more info)
> ck-patchset & cfs has been an excellent combination so far ...
ok, it's great that people are picking up -ck. What i was trying to
figure out here was whether this is a vanilla-O(1)->CFS, SD->CFS or
CFS.23->CFS.24 comparison. It seems it's probably a CFS.23->CFS.24
comparison. I'd also be interested in those people's impressions about
CFSv24 who previously found SD to be superior to earlier CFS versions.
If there's still any regression (interactivity or other) we might still
be able to fix it before 2.6.24 is released.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date:
RE: [PATCH] Time-based RFC 4122 UUID generator
- Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH] Time-based RFC 4122 UUID generator
- Previous by thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Next by thread:
[patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Index(es):
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
