* Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > whether that interpreted syslet language survives is still an open > > question - it was extremely ugly when i wrote the first version of > > it and it only got uglier since then :-) > > Aha! You admitted it finally :) damn :-) but if the only alternative is to be fundamentally slower, i am not afraid of some ugliness :-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] proc: Fix the threaded /proc/self.
- Next by Date: CONFIG_PROFILING on production system
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
- Index(es):
 |