Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:28:51 -0800 (PST)
> Roland McGrath <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > Andrew, it is very easy to send the new patch to fix the code, but is it
> > > possible to fix the changelog somehow for the patch in -mm tree?
> 
> Sure, just send me the new text.
> 
> > I'd prefer a comment in the code there making it explicit that ->sighand is
> > a "reaped yet" synchronization check (under tasklist_lock).
> 
> that works too.

Will do tomorrow. Actually, I just realized we don't need need either check.
release_task() first does ptrace_unlink(), then __exit_signal(). This means
that (child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) under tasklist_lock implies we have the valid
->sighand/signal.

Will send the patch with the comment.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux