On (20/11/07 12:18), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Went back and revisited this. Allocating them at boot-time is below but
> > essentially it is a silly and it makes sense to just have two zonelists
> > where one of them is for __GFP_THISNODE. Implementation wise, this involves
> > dropping the last patch in the set and the overall result is still a reduction
> > in the number of zonelists.
>
> Allright with me. Andrew could we get this patchset merged?
>
They will not merge cleanly with a recent tree. I expect to be ready to
post a new set when regression tests complete later this evening.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
