Re: [rfc 08/45] cpu alloc: x86 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 04:50, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
I might be pointing out the obvious, but on x86-64 there is definitely
not 256TB of VM available for this.
Well maybe in the future.

That would either require more than 4 levels or larger pages
in page tables.

One of the issues that I ran into is that I had to place the cpu area
in between to make the offsets link right.

Above -2GB, otherwise you cannot address them


This limitation shouldn't apply to the percpu area, since gs_base can be pointed anywhere in the address space -- in effect we're always indirect.

Obviously the offsets *within* the percpu area has to be in range (±2 GB per cpu for absolute offsets, slightly smaller for %rip-based addressing -- obviously judicious use of an offset for gs_base is essential in the latter case).

Thus you want the percpu areas below -2 GB where they don't interfere with modules or any other precious address space.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux