Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Hold off testing for the moment. Getting all the corner cases right for
> __GFP_THISNODE has turned too complicated to be considered as part of a larger
> patchset. I believe it makes sense to drop the final patch and settle with
> having two zonelists. One of these will be for __GFP_THISNODE allocations. We
> can then tackle removing that zonelist at a later date.

Ack.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v9
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
    • From: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rfc 01/45] ACPI: Avoid references to impossible processors.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]