2.6.23-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us
know.
------------------
From: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
patch c06a018fa5362fa9ed0768bd747c0fab26bc8849 in mainline.
This is not a new problem in 2.6.23-git17. 2.6.22/2.6.23 is buggy in the
same way.
Reiserfs could accumulate dirty sub-page-size files until umount time.
They cannot be synced to disk by pdflush routines or explicit `sync'
commands. Only `umount' can do the trick.
The direct cause is: the dirty page's PG_dirty is wrongly _cleared_.
Call trace:
[<ffffffff8027e920>] cancel_dirty_page+0xd0/0xf0
[<ffffffff8816d470>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_cut_from_item+0x660/0x710
[<ffffffff8816d791>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_do_truncate+0x271/0x530
[<ffffffff8815872d>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_truncate_file+0xfd/0x3b0
[<ffffffff8815d3d0>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_file_release+0x1e0/0x340
[<ffffffff802a187c>] __fput+0xcc/0x1b0
[<ffffffff802a1ba6>] fput+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8029e676>] filp_close+0x56/0x90
[<ffffffff8029fe0d>] sys_close+0xad/0x110
[<ffffffff8020c41e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
Fix the bug by removing the cancel_dirty_page() call. Tests show that
it causes no bad behaviors on various write sizes.
=== for the patient ===
Here are more detailed demonstrations of the problem.
1) the page has both PG_dirty(D)/PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY(d) after being written to;
and then only PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY(d) remains after the file is closed.
------------------------------ screen 0 ------------------------------
[T0] root /home/wfg# cat > /test/tiny
[T1] hi
[T2] root /home/wfg#
------------------------------ screen 1 ------------------------------
[T1] root /home/wfg# echo /test/tiny > /proc/filecache
[T1] root /home/wfg# cat /proc/filecache
# file /test/tiny
# flags R:referenced A:active M:mmap U:uptodate D:dirty W:writeback O:owner B:buffer d:dirty w:writeback
# idx len state refcnt
0 1 ___UD__Bd_ 2
[T2] root /home/wfg# cat /proc/filecache
# file /test/tiny
# flags R:referenced A:active M:mmap U:uptodate D:dirty W:writeback O:owner B:buffer d:dirty w:writeback
# idx len state refcnt
0 1 ___U___Bd_ 2
2) note the non-zero 'cancelled_write_bytes' after /tmp/hi is copied.
------------------------------ screen 0 ------------------------------
[T0] root /home/wfg# echo hi > /tmp/hi
[T1] root /home/wfg# cp /tmp/hi /dev/stdin /test
[T2] hi
[T3] root /home/wfg#
------------------------------ screen 1 ------------------------------
[T1] root /proc/4397# cd /proc/`pidof cp`
[T1] root /proc/4713# cat io
rchar: 8396
wchar: 3
syscr: 20
syscw: 1
read_bytes: 0
write_bytes: 20480
cancelled_write_bytes: 4096
[T2] root /proc/4713# cat io
rchar: 8399
wchar: 6
syscr: 21
syscw: 2
read_bytes: 0
write_bytes: 24576
cancelled_write_bytes: 4096
//Question: the 'write_bytes' is a bit more than expected ;-)
Tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/reiserfs/stree.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/stree.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/stree.c
@@ -1458,9 +1458,6 @@ static void unmap_buffers(struct page *p
}
bh = next;
} while (bh != head);
- if (PAGE_SIZE == bh->b_size) {
- cancel_dirty_page(page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
- }
}
}
}
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]