Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part

Hi,

Here you can find some performance comparison in terms of CPUutilization and transactions per second (using FFSB) on ext4 filesystemwith and without i_version option.


http://bullopensource.org/ext4/20071116/ffsb-write.html

regards,
Jean noel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part
  - From: Cordenner jean noel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part
  - From: Cordenner jean noel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part
  - From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] i_version update - ext4 part
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]