Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:52:48 -0500
Mark Lord <[email protected]> wro
All of which reminds me of perhaps *the* most important reason to keep
core functionality like "IRQ distribution" *inside* the kernel:
It has to pass peer review on this mailing list.
that's a reason to keep it in the *source*, that's not the same as
..
Ack. :)
keeping it in ring0 pinning down memory all the time etc ;)
..
I belive it *must* remain pinned in memory to be effective,
because I also know it must run much more frequently than it
currently seems to run, in order to respond to quick changes
in IRQ load.
Eg. a heretofore idle device is suddenly now being used to copy
a DVD-sized file around. It *must* respond quickly to changes
in load like this, or system latencies will suffer badly.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
