> At the end is some example code how things could get even more cleaned
> up. It shows how I think pnp layer and one example driver would get
Your example adds rather than removes code.
> If this is not an option, please advise how to move on here:
> Still use struct resources for dma and irq, but just do not name it
> _start, but name the macro pnp_irq_no?
Is it actually even worth changing in the first place ? You seem to be
complicating the code not simplyifying it, and at the end of the day
ISAPnP is obsolete and BIOS PnP is obsoleted by ACPI
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
