From: Bill Fink <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:07 -0500
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> > 2. What's about your suggestion, I thought about this and I am going to agree.
> >
> > Arguments, which convinced me are:
> >
> > - arping still works.
> > - any piece of reasonable software should work.
> > - if Windows understands DaD (is it really true? I cannot believe)
> > and it is unhappy about our responce and does not block use
> > of duplicate address only due to this, we _must_ accomodate ASAP.
> > - if we do,we have to use 0 protocol address, no choice.
>
> I agree the target protocol address should be 0 in this case.
Patches, someone :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
