Nick Piggin wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 15:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:29:29AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Agreed. When userspace has something to do with the way IRQs are
delivered, it's going to smell as bad as micro-kernels...
The next step to a micro-kernel would then be hardware drivers and file
systems in userspace? ;-)
We already have those. So the next step would be to pretend the
performance critical ones can be in userspace and remain competitive,
wouldn't it? ;)
Hey, I have a great idea... we can create a microkernel^W hypervisor and
make a single process^W domain do all the I/O...
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
