Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 15:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:29:29AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:

Agreed. When userspace has something to do with the way IRQs are
delivered, it's going to smell as bad as micro-kernels...
The next step to a micro-kernel would then be hardware drivers and file
systems in userspace?  ;-)

We already have those. So the next step would be to pretend the
performance critical ones can be in userspace and remain competitive,
wouldn't it? ;)

Hey, I have a great idea... we can create a microkernel^W hypervisor and make a single process^W domain do all the I/O...

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux