Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64

From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:59:33 -0800 (PST)

> In that case the generic fallbacks can just provide what you already
> have.

I understand, I was just letting you know why we probably won't
take advantage of this new stuff :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v6: kexec hibernate/resume
• Next by Date: Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures
• Previous by thread: Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]