Re: [Patch] mm/sparse.c: Check the return value of sparse_index_alloc().

[Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:54 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> Since sparse_index_alloc() can return NULL on memory allocation failure,
> we must deal with the failure condition when calling it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index e06f514..d245e59 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static int __meminit sparse_index_init(unsigned long section_nr, int nid)
>  		return -EEXIST;
> 
>  	section = sparse_index_alloc(nid);
> +	if (!section)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	/*
>  	 * This lock keeps two different sections from
>  	 * reallocating for the same index

Oddly enough, sparse_add_one_section() doesn't seem to like to check
its allocations.  The usemap is checked, but not freed on error.  If you
want to fix this up, I think it needs a little more love than just two
lines.  

Do you want to try to add some actual error handling to
sparse_add_one_section()?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/