Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
> On 11/19, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> I think we can solve the immediate issues cleanly
>> without it, and we are pretty much in bug fixing territory now.
>
> Yes sure. Besides, the "patch" I showed for illustration is not complete,
> and it is not easy to solve the problems with exec().
>
> Could you re-send your patch with changelog to Andrew? I agree, it is better
> to pass a pointer than to add the horrible hack to proc_pid_readdir().
Definitely. I'm just testing now to make certain my code actually works.
I have respun my patch to return a structure as I figured out how to
do that cleanly.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
