Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Minor cleanups

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Minor scheduler cleanups:
> 
> - Fix coding style
> - remove obsolete comment
> - Use list_for_each_entry_rcu when walking task group list

>  #define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
> -	list_for_each_entry(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
>  
>  /* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */
>  static inline int
> @@ -1126,7 +1126,10 @@ static void print_cfs_stats(struct seq_f
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>  	print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, &cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs);
>  #endif
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq)
>  		print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, cfs_rq);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

hm, why is this a cleanup?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/