On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:15:52 -0800 Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:
> @@ -35,8 +36,8 @@ struct bug_entry {
> #define WARN_ON(condition) ({ \
> int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
> if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) { \
> - printk("WARNING: at %s:%d %s()\n", __FILE__, \
> - __LINE__, __FUNCTION__); \
> + printk("WARNING: at %s:%d %s() (%s)\n", __FILE__, \
> + __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, UTS_RELEASE); \
> dump_stack(); \
> } \
> unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
that made our 1100-odd WARN_ON sites fatter.
I suppose sometime we should optimise WARN_ON like we did BUG_ON.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
