On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 19:04 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> split the list with you? Feel free to take any of those :-) dev->sem is
> nontrivial and probably not possible right now - and some of the others
> might be problematic too. But there might be fixable ones in the list.
> This shouldnt become like the BKL conversion - never truly finished.
If I said I was going to do some set, at least it's more likely that the
work isn't duplicated..
What specifically is wrong with dev->sem ?
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
- Re: [BUG on PREEMPT_RT, 2.6.23.1-rt5] in rt-mutex code and signals
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]