On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:36:13 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, eric miao wrote:
> > if (!requested)
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "GPIO-%d autorequested\n",
> > - chip->base + offset);
> > + pr_debug("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", gpio);
>
> Leave the printk in ... this is the sort of thing we want
> to see fixed, which becomes unlikely once you hide such
> diagnostics. And for that matter, what would be enabling
> the "-DDEBUG" that would trigger a pr_debug() message?
The original code isn't correct either. Either this is a debug message
and indeed pr_debug() should be used, or it's not and KERN_DEBUG should
be replaced by a lower log level.
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
