Re: [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:53:08 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:

> Time has come to change NR_OPEN value, some production servers hit the
> not so 'ridiculously high value' of 1024*1024 file descriptors per process.

Why fiddle with the kernel defaults when every distribution can manage
this in user space - including picking defaults by memory size or
platform ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.24-rc2-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
• Next by Date: RE: [patch 07/30] cpu alloc: IA64 support
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] NR_OPEN should be raised a litle bit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]