Re: [PATCH] PERCPU : __percpu_alloc_mask() can dynamically size percpu_data storage

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Instead of allocating a fix sized array of NR_CPUS pointers for percpu_data,
> we can use nr_cpu_ids, which is generally < NR_CPUS.

Yes we can. Could you either use [] or [0] instead of the index there? 
Somehow the patch vanished when I replied to it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] PERCPU : __percpu_alloc_mask() can dynamically size percpu_data storage
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 1/6] scsi: megaraid_sas - add hibernation support
Next by Date: Re: distro specific kernels vs vanilla kernel and how to compare among each other
Previous by thread: [PATCH] PERCPU : __percpu_alloc_mask() can dynamically size percpu_data storage
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/9 RESEND] cxgb3 - Use wild card for PCI subdevice ID match
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]