Hi Adam,
If this condition check is not included, the root user have to use the
function
setrlimit() to set the lock_limit of a normal user to RLIM_INFINITY. I
think
the /proc interface 'hugetlb_shm_group' is introduced to avoid these
difficulties.
Please correct me, if I am wrong.
Regarding the problem with the 'if' condition, I feel that even in the
case of
user's lock_limit is set to unlimited, he could use unlimited hugepages and
normal page shm segments. So what is the advantage in this scenario.
I tried to avoid the #ifdef statements. But the variable
sysctl_hugetlb_shm_group is defined
in fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c, this segment is enabled only when the config
parameter
CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is set to yes. If the hugetlbfs is not selected while
configuring,
there would be a compilation error.
Is there any better way so that the root user can configure the gid in
'hugetlb_shm_group'
and the user is able to access the huge pages using shmget().
Thanks
Ciju
aglitke wrote:
Hi Ciju:
I am still not exactly sure why this patch is needed. As I read
user_shm_lock():
lock_limit = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur;
if (lock_limit == RLIM_INFINITY)
allowed = 1;
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
if (!allowed &&
locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
goto out;
... if the user's locked limit (ulimit -l) is set to unlimited, allowed
(above) is set to 1. In that case, the second part of that if() is
bypassed, and the function grants permission. Therefore, the easy
solution is to make sure your user's lock_limit is RLIM_INFINITY.
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 19:45 +0530, Ciju Rajan K wrote:
<snip>
@@ -248,8 +249,14 @@ int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct us
allowed = 1;
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
+ if (!allowed &&
+ locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit &&
+ (!(capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) || in_group_p(sysctl_hugetlb_shm_group))))
This will allow any user in hugetlb_shm_group to make unlimited use of
huge page shm segments _and_ normal page shm segments. Definitely not
what you want.
+#else
if (!allowed &&
locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
+#endif
goto out;
get_uid(user);
user->locked_shm += locked;
Please don't add new #ifdefs into .c files, headers only.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]