Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0

>>>>> "DM" == David Miller <[email protected]> writes:

>> Reply:
>> Opcode: reply (0x0002)
>> Sender HW: 00:AA.00:AA:00:AA
>> Sender IP:   192.168.0.1
>> Target HW:  00:AA:00:AA:00:AA
>> Target IP:    192.168.0.1

DM> And this is exactly a sensible response in my opinion.

Why send the reply at all? Sending a unicast packet with yourself as
destination MAC seems a bit useless. Do switches propagate it?


/Benny


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 (was: Strange behavior in arp probe reply, bug or feature?)
    • From: "Jonas Danielsson" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
    • From: "Jonas Danielsson" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplified)
• Next by Date: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - kernel bug on nfs v4
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]