Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] actual sys_indirect code

[Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>]

Ulrich Drepper a écrit :
> This is the actual architecture-independent part of the system call
> implementation.

> +
> +long sys_indirect(struct indirect_registers __user *userregs,
> +		  void __user *userparams, size_t paramslen)
> +{
> +	struct indirect_registers regs;
> +	long result;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&regs, userregs, sizeof(regs)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	switch (INDIRECT_SYSCALL (&regs))
> +	{
> +#ifdef __NR_accept
> +	case __NR_accept:
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __NR_socketpair
> +	case __NR_socketpair:
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __NR_socket
> +	case __NR_socket:
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __NR_socketcall
> +	case __NR_socketcall:
> +#endif
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (paramslen > sizeof(union indirect_params))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (copy_from_user(&current->indirect_params, userparams, paramslen))

Here, you should clear current->indirect_params before returning -EFAULT
                {
                memset(&current->indirect_params, 0, paramslen);
> +		return -EFAULT;
                }
copy_from_user could do a partial copy (so dirty first bytes of 
indirect_params) and all furthers calls to socket()/open() and so on could be 
broken.

> +
> +	result = CALL_INDIRECT(&regs);
> +
> +	memset(&current->indirect_params, '\0', paramslen);
> +
> +	return result;
> +}
> -

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/