On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The x86 unification resulted in CONFIG_X86_HT no longer being
> > set if (X86_32 && MK8).
> Yup - my bad. I wrongly assumed MK8 was an X86_64 thing.
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
> >
> > After grep'ing through the tree I think the problem is that different
> > places have different assumptions about the semantics of CONFIG_X86_HT,
> > either:
> > - hyperthreading or
> > - multicore
> > and the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC dependencies are just one of the
> > symptoms.
> >
> > This should be sorted out properly, but until then we should keep the
> > 2.6.23 status quo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
>
> I assume Thomas & Co will forward the patch.
After looking what does what and fixing it.
Right now this patch is not a 1:1 replacement of the .23 status quo,
as it now makes SCHED_SMT and SCHED_HT depend on !MK8 for 64bit.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
