Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news

From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:50:22 +1100

> I'd prefer to have a transaction() system call like I suggested to
> Nick rather than overloading read() like this.

So much for getting rid of the extra system calls...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
  • Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
• Previous by thread: Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
• Next by thread: Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]