On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 23:24 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> mmap()s can be different from read in that the syscall may have little
> relation to when the data gets used. But I guess it's still a best
> effort thing. Fair enough.
Agreed that mmap() is special and very problematic on NFS. However I
can't see how we can improve on the existing models short of some
significant protocol modifications, and so far, nobody has presented the
IETF with a good case for why they need this level of cache consistency.
Cheers
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
