Re: [patch 2/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPROFILE

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

Hi Mathieu.

> 
> It would be much better to do
> 
>         depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES
> 
> in that generic file, and then architectures that do support it would just
> have a
> 
>         bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES
>                 default y

The above suggestion is actually not exactly the best way to do it...
First the naming..
A quick grep shows following usage today (in Kconfig files)
ARCH_HAS	51
ARCH_SUPPORTS	4
HAVE_ARCH	7

ARCH_HAS is the clear winner.


In the common Kconfig file do:

config FOO
	depends on ARCH_HAS_FOO
	bool "bla bla" 

config ARCH_HAS_FOO
	def_bool n


In the arch specific Kconfig file in a suitable place do:

config SUITABLE_OPTION
	select ARCH_HAS_FOO


The naming of ARCH_HAS_ is fixed and shall be:
ARCH_HAS_<config option it will enable>


Only a single line added pr. architecture.
And we will end up with a (maybe even commented) list of trivial selects.

Sorry for providing late feedback on this!

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/