On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 07:17:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:07:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's not only complexity. Each new sysfs entry costs memory.
> > Memory is not free. There should be always a good reason for those.
>
> It's not a lot of memory; it's one directory and a couple of files for
> each PCI slot in the system. Even huge systems have maybe 200 slots.
> In order for this to take up as much as one page of ram on a typical PC
> with six slots, this would have to consume 680 bytes per directory. I
> don't think sysfs is that inefficient (and if it is, maybe this feature
> is not where the problem is, given the 'power' directory per device, the
> 19 files per scsi device, the huge numbers of symlinks, etc).
It becomes much more when someone does a find /sys. dentries are
expensive. They eventually can get pruned again, but it's still
costly to do that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
