On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
> > > > These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
> > > > as 2.6.24-rcX
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > NeilBrown
> > > >
> > > > [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow creation of bitmaps with v1.0 metadata.
> > > > [PATCH 002 of 2] md: raid5: fix clearing of biofill operations
> > >
> > > I don't see these patches in 2.6.24-rcX, are they there under some other
> > > subject?
> >
> > Oh nevermind, I found them, sorry for the noise...
> >
>
> Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 "md: raid5:
> fix clearing of biofill operations" which ended up misapplied in
> Linus' tree, You should either also pick up def6ae26 "md: fix
> misapplied patch in raid5.c" or I can resend the original "raid5: fix
> clearing of biofill operations."
>
> The other patch for -stable "raid5: fix unending write sequence" is
> currently in -mm.
Hm, I've attached the two patches that I have right now in the -stable
tree so far (still have over 100 patches to go, so I might not have
gotten to them yet if you have sent them). These were sent to me by
Andrew on their way to Linus. if I should drop either one, or add
another one, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
>From [email protected] Mon Oct 22 20:45:35 2007
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:45:11 -0700
Subject: md: fix an unsigned compare to allow creation of bitmaps with v1.0 metadata
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
patch 85bfb4da8cad483a4e550ec89060d05a4daf895b in mainline.
As page->index is unsigned, this all becomes an unsigned comparison, which
almost always returns an error.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/bitmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *
if (bitmap->offset < 0) {
/* DATA BITMAP METADATA */
if (bitmap->offset
- + page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512)
+ + (long)(page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512))
+ size/512 > 0)
/* bitmap runs in to metadata */
return -EINVAL;
>From [email protected] Mon Oct 22 20:45:44 2007
From: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:45:11 -0700
Subject: md: raid5: fix clearing of biofill operations
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
patch 4ae3f847e49e3787eca91bced31f8fd328d50496 in mainline.
ops_complete_biofill() runs outside of spin_lock(&sh->lock) and clears the
'pending' and 'ack' bits. Since the test_and_ack_op() macro only checks
against 'complete' it can get an inconsistent snapshot of pending work.
Move the clearing of these bits to handle_stripe5(), under the lock.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Joel Bertrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -377,7 +377,12 @@ static unsigned long get_stripe_work(str
ack++;
sh->ops.count -= ack;
- BUG_ON(sh->ops.count < 0);
+ if (unlikely(sh->ops.count < 0)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "pending: %#lx ops.pending: %#lx ops.ack: %#lx "
+ "ops.complete: %#lx\n", pending, sh->ops.pending,
+ sh->ops.ack, sh->ops.complete);
+ BUG();
+ }
return pending;
}
@@ -551,8 +556,7 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *s
}
}
}
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
- clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
+ set_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
return_io(return_bi);
@@ -2903,6 +2907,13 @@ static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe
s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
/* Now to look around and see what can be done */
+ /* clean-up completed biofill operations */
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) {
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete);
+ }
+
rcu_read_lock();
for (i=disks; i--; ) {
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
