Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!

Amit Shah wrote:
> Glauber, are you planning on consolidating the dma_ops structure for 32- and 
> 64-bit? 32-bit doesn't currently have a dma_mapping_ops structure, which 
> makes paravirtualizing DMA access difficult on 32-bit.


I think it's a good idea.  While I haven't worked out the details yet,
it seems like something I'll need for Xen dom0 support.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
    • From: Amit Shah <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects
• Previous by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
• Next by thread: [PATCH 4/6] scsi: megaraid_sas - call cmd completion from reset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]