Hi Eric,
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Instead of using less RAM, you could just boot with rhash_entries=1024
to lower the size of this table.
I just tried that and it seems to reduce the scan time. This is the
result for the first 40 minutes of runtime:
root@mpc0:/# /tmp/wait.rt
looping 1 milli seconds nanosleep ...
17:10:11/425384 #1 MAX 1996/83117/-268599896 us/tick/usec (at 2107848557)
17:10:11/427385 #2 MAX 2001/83327/2001 us/tick/usec (at 2107931884)
17:10:11/433534 #5 MAX 2149/89477/2150 us/tick/usec (at 2108187839)
17:27:02/5897 #505291 MAX 2512/104576/2513 us/tick/usec (at 1223589469)
The first ~10ms delay usually occurred after ~15 minutes. So one could
argue that the reported HIGH-value at 17:27:02 (GMT) is the first flush
of IP route cache. And all later flushes weren't longer than 2,5ms.
Thanks to all of you, especially Eric. Now it seems I got an instrument
to lower system response time.
Cheers,
Florian
PS: Unfortunately I had to remove some CC:-entries since the local
firewall seems to not allow anything but NNTP (for gmane) and HTTP.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]