On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 11:05 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Anyway, it seems its the generic irq stuff that uses raw_spinlock_t and
> disables IRQs, so there isn't much we can do from the ARCH level I'm
> afraid :-(
>
> Ingo, any sane ideas?
Ok benh came up with a workable idea, he just needs a night's sleep to
come up with the details :-)
The idea is to fill the radix tree from host->ops->map() (or
irq_create_mapping()) as that should still be preemptable, and then
convert all other uses to RCU lookups.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]