On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
> newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
> opposite of what we actually want
Nice. Just what the world needs. I wonder what the heck that format
means. Obviously the "corrupt" check is wrong as a "\ No newline" line
is valid not corrupt. Now when is "\ No newline" a good thing and when
a bad thing. It _looks_ like it is 'bound' to the line before, and if
so then its pretty simple.
Bad:
> +moo
> \ No newline at end of file
Good:
> -moo
> \ No newline at end of file
/me goes read the source for diff. Sigh.
Thanks for the report.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
