On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:18 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]> wrote: > I can not contact with Len for several days, while the oops on battery > seems quite important. > It also seem to behave well in -mm tree (as part of Len's acpi-test). > Will you send this patch to Linus without approval from Len or should I? Please send it yourself - your latest version seems a little different from the one in git-acpi and I'd just be dangerous trying to work out which one is needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Romano Giannetti <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]>
- 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- Prev by Date: Re: iozone write 50% regression in kernel 2.6.24-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Index(es):
 |