On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
> printing eip:
> c022807f
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp
> firewire_ohci firewire_core dvb_usb crc_itu_t evdev snd_hda_intel
> rtc_cmos sky2 dvb_core applesmc led_class coretemp hwmon
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c022807f>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.23.1 #4)
> EIP is at xfs_iget_core+0x6f/0x690
> eax: 0033f000 ebx: 3e0d2010 ecx: f7826000 edx: 0033f000
> esi: 001346d7 edi: 00000000 ebp: f7525214 esp: f68b7cb4
> ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
> Process squid (pid: 2967, ti=f68b6000 task=f6833030 task.ti=f68b6000)
> Stack: c024f1b1 00000001 f6a3d6c0 001346d7 f789ce00 c18993d8 c04fb280
> f7525218
> 00000000 00000000 f7826000 e652c240 00000000 3e0d2010 e652c25c
> e652c240
> 001346d7 f7826000 c0228774 001346d7 00000000 00000000 00000000
> f68b7d80
> Call Trace:
> [<c024f1b1>] kmem_zone_alloc+0x51/0xb0
> [<c0228774>] xfs_iget+0xd4/0x160
> [<c024474b>] xfs_dir_lookup_int+0x9b/0x100
> [<c0247ec5>] xfs_lookup+0x75/0xa0
> [<c0256874>] xfs_vn_lookup+0x54/0x90
> [<c0177a32>] do_lookup+0x122/0x1a0
> [<c01794d4>] __link_path_walk+0x784/0xd80
> [<c0273072>] __next_cpu+0x12/0x30
> [<c0121dbd>] find_busiest_group+0x19d/0x6a0
> [<c0179b15>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xc0
> [<c0131350>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
> [<c016eb62>] get_unused_fd_flags+0x52/0xc0
> [<c0179db3>] do_path_lookup+0x73/0x1b0
> [<c01719b8>] get_empty_filp+0x58/0x120
> [<c017a9d1>] __path_lookup_intent_open+0x51/0xa0
> [<c017aab0>] path_lookup_open+0x20/0x30
> [<c017abb6>] open_namei+0x66/0x640
> [<c0131697>] lock_timer_base+0x27/0x60
> [<c0131715>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x45/0x50
> [<c016ee7e>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x60
> [<c0131350>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
> [<c016eb62>] get_unused_fd_flags+0x52/0xc0
> [<c016eefc>] do_sys_open+0x4c/0xe0
> [<c016efcc>] sys_open+0x1c/0x20
> [<c010428e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x85
> =======================
> Code: 44 24 1c 8b 44 24 1c e8 60 92 1b 00 8b 5d 00 85 db 89 5c 24 34 75
> 14 e9 90 00 00 00 8b 5b 04 85 db 89 5c 24 34 0f 84 81 00 00 00 <8b> 53
> 3c 8b 43 38 31 fa 31 f0 09 c2 75 e3 8d 83 dc 00 00 00 e8
> EIP: [<c022807f>] xfs_iget_core+0x6f/0x690 SS:ESP 0068:f68b7cb4
>
> Does this ring any bells?
No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
reproducable?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
